Skip to main content

Playing a Delaying Action in Chain of Command

By
Recently I played a quick game and the scenario was A Delaying Action.  This was a great way to show how only three patrol markers and really set the patrol phase in your favor.  Most games I've seen played or played in had each player using four deployment markers.  The rules state that some scenarios will let you pick between three and four and there has been discussion about the benefit of only three.  Well today I found out when playing a delaying action as a the defender, you only get three patrol markers, and it was awesome.
So normally, you and your opponent take turns moving the patrol markers on the board until one side has all of their markers locked down.  However, with 4 markers each side I've seen this usually leads to static lines near the center of the board and sometimes doesn't really showcase creative deployments.  But, what is really cool I have noticed is that if you play with three markers and your opponent has four, you can force the ending of the patrol phase before your opponent can place to their optimal setting with their fourth marker.  In other words, you can stick your opponent with poorly placed markers.  With your three, you have a better chance of picking better deployment spots and that is huge.
In today's game, the layout worked in favor of the defending Germans.  The Germans did have to place on the far side of a short river with a small bridge crossing.  The rest of the board was covered in large expanses of forest.  This benefited the Germans as they could cross the bridge quickly and get to good defensive positions on the bridge.  The Russians actually got stuck with jump off points in the forests with one jump off point at the back of the board because the three German patrol markers were locked rather early.  And I really think that helped the defending Germans because the Russians were forced to place within forests and then really decide how to advance from the woods and into the heavily defended German territory.
The phases played quickly and the Germans were able to get good defensive positions along the bridge defending the jump off point that the Russians needed to secure a victory.  One jump off point in a nearby woods did allow the Germans to place along a wood edge in a tactical stance overlooking the potential Russian deployments.  As luck would have it, the Russians deployed in the woods and each time they approached the woods edge, they were attacked by waiting Germans on their phases.  A good combination of dice rolls and only placing three markers to force an early end to the patrol phase forcing the Russians to not place in optimal places.  Basically, the Germans won.  Great game because I learned that just using three patrol markers can give you a great placement advantage as the defender.  Use them to pin your opponent early and force them into bad placement spots.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Random Movement in Chain of Command

By
One of the first things I noticed in Chain of Command is that your movement is random and not a set amount.  Depending on your movement choice, tactical, normal or all out, you roll dice to see how far you can move.  This is modified for special terrain and buildings.  I didn't know what to think of that until I played out a couple games and I really like the mechanic. Most games I have played allow for infantry, vehicles, cavalry, etc. to have a fixed movement rate which is modified by terrain.  That works just fine.  So why do i like the random roll?  In a narrative element, it takes into account things like your teams willingness to move forward, how cautious they are moving based on perceived threat or even just how much more unsteady the environment is.  Let's take a look at terrain and how it can affect movement. In most war games, movement for tanks is a fixed value based on tank.  As you cross terrain, you subtract from the movement al...
3 comments
Read more

Urban Operations Overview

By
I finally have had some nice sit down and play time with Urban Operations.  I took my time jumping in because I was intimidated by the rules.  Not that they are overly complicated, but that they weren't very intuitive for me to follow on the first read through.  After my second read through a few weeks later, I finally laid out the pieces and gave the game a go.  This for me is definitely a game you need to play as you read the rules.  Everything started to click once I had it out and in motion. Probably the most unique thing to the game is the concept of weapon effect.  Most of us have seen this in videos, movies, or in person.  It's the representation of the shockwave, concussions, blasts, fire etc. when firing certain weapons or triggering explosions.  There is a simple mechanic marked on each unit card giving the details of this effect on the game board and how it interacts with troops.  This helps to bring the game into the realm of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old School Tactical East Front Turn 1

By
It has begun.  After setting up the forces, I have actually started playing the game.  Since this is my first actual play through, I decided to keep the rule book handy.  I really wanted to play the game as close to the rules as possible and make sure to share the page and rule section I'm looking at as I play.  This of course led to a much slower game than I'm sure is intended, but as with most games. once you learn it, the game will play quicker. I did find mistakes as I played, but I did try to correct myself as I played and I think I caught most mistakes.  The first big mistake I made is that vehicles do not do group movement.  I even read over that the other day as I brushed up on fire groups and still made that mistake.  Also, learning how to properly apply the combat modifiers when using the combat charts will still take some time.  It's not overly complicated, but sometimes rules interpretation may lead to mistakes. I'm hoping that for...
Post a Comment
Read more